How it will work

Four weeks. Four sets of artifacts. One decision.

Week 1

Protect the clock and build the record

Disclosure inventory and jurisdiction map
Contributor and ownership audit
Mechanism interview and causal ladder
Architecture, data-flow, state and failure-mode diagrams

Week 2

Attack the idea with prior art

Element matrix across vocabularies
Adversarial search: classifications, citations, non-patent literature
Claim charts against every relevant reference
Disconfirming-evidence review: go, reshape or stop

Week 3

Build technical evidence and fallback depth

Baselines, metrics and reproducible tests
Negative results and boundary conditions
Variants, alternatives and design-around candidates
The trade-secret line: what never goes in the filing

Week 4

Prepare the professional decision

Six-gate scorecard with named uncertainties
Claim families tied to revenue and detectability
Jurisdiction stress tests: CA, US, UK, EPO in one table
The counsel package, the bounded review, the decision memo

What the curriculum does not do: it does not score your invention, predict an examination outcome, or replace a registered patent agent. Its deliverable is a package for counsel and a logged decision — file, reshape, defer, protect differently, or stop.

Built for

Founders who have a demo, a deadline and a budget that can’t absorb a wasted filing.

Technical founders who know the mechanism and need the vocabulary. CEOs who keep getting asked whether they have patents. Accelerator leads and advisers who want a repeatable programme to run with every cohort before their next public demo.

Pricing, cohort dates and format (self-paced or guided) will be announced to the waitlist first. Nothing is set until it is.

Run the sprint with someone in your corner.

Four weeks. Four sets of artifacts. One decision.

Founders who have a demo, a deadline and a budget that can’t absorb a wasted filing.

Be first to hear when it opens.